Decoder-only Transformer

Exploring Decoder-Only Transformers for NLP and More

Decoder-Only Transformer: A Comprehensive Guide to Neural Networks in NLP (Natural Language Processing) and Beyond

How Decoder-Only Transformers Work

A decoder-only transformer is a variation of the transformer architecture tailored primarily for generative tasks. Unlike the original transformer, which uses both an encoder and a decoder for tasks like translation, the decoder-only transformer is streamlined for one-way tasks where the input doesnโ€™t need separate encoding, such as autoregressive text generation. Each token is fed sequentially into the decoder, and the model self-attends to all previously generated tokens in the sequence.

What’s a decoder-only transformer?

A “decoder-only transformer” is a type of neural network architecture that’s commonly used in natural language processing tasks such as machine translation and text summarization. It is a variation of the original transformer architecture, which was introduced in the 2017 paper by Google researchers “Attention is All you Need.”

Background on transformers

The transformer architecture is based on a self-attention mechanism, which allows the model to weigh the importance of different words in a sentence when making predictions. The original transformer architecture includes both an encoder and a decoder, where the encoder processes the input sentence and the decoder generates the output sentence.

In a “decoder-only transformer,” only the decoder portion of the model is used, and the input is passed directly to the decoder without being processed by an encoder. This can be useful in certain tasks, such as text summarization, where the model needs to generate a shorter output based on a longer input.

A decoder-only transformer is trained to take in the encoded vector and generate the output in the form of probability distribution over the vocabulary. The decoder use this probability distribution to predict the next word in the sequence.

Decoder-only models generate text by predicting the next token based only on previously generated tokens (unidirectional), while encoder-decoder models rely on encoding the entire input first before the decoder generates the output, often suitable for tasks requiring bidirectional context.

Decoder-Only Transformer Text Generation

Imagine a task where the model is required to generate a continuation of the following text:

Input: “The sun was setting behind the mountains, casting a golden hue over the…”

In a decoder-only transformer like GPT (Generative Pretrained Transformer), this input is processed in a step-by-step fashion:

  1. Tokenization: The input sentence is tokenized (split into smaller units, like words or subwords). These tokens are fed into the decoder one by one, with each token generating an internal representation of the preceding text.
    • First token: “The”
    • Second token: “sun”
    • Third token: “was”
    • And so on…
  2. Self-Attention Mechanism: Each token attends to all the previously seen tokens. For example, when processing the word “setting”, the decoder also takes into account the words “The sun was”, allowing the model to capture long-range dependencies and context.
  3. Autoregressive Generation: The decoder generates one word at a time by predicting the next word based on the current context. For instance, after seeing the input “The sun was setting…”, the model might generate “horizon” as the next token, building off what it has already processed. This continues iteratively until the model reaches a stopping point or a predefined length is achieved.Output: “The sun was setting behind the mountains, casting a golden hue over the horizon as the evening breeze whispered through the trees.”

Efficiency Compared to Encoder-Decoder Systems

The decoder-only transformer streamlines text generation by skipping the encoding step (!), making it faster and more efficient for autoregressive tasks like text continuation or chatbot dialogue, compared to encoder-decoder systems that require both steps.

  • No Separate Encoder: In encoder-decoder architectures, the input text needs to be fully encoded before the decoder can generate the output. For example, in machine translation tasks, the encoder first processes the entire source sentence before the decoder starts generating the target sentence. This two-step process adds computational overhead, especially when the tasks involve simple text generation.
  • Faster Generation for Autoregressive Tasks: Since the decoder-only model directly works on autoregressive tasks (where the output is generated word-by-word in a single direction), it eliminates the need for encoding and is more efficient for tasks like text continuation, summarization, or any task that doesnโ€™t require the bidirectional attention of an encoder.

In Summary: The decoder-only transformer streamlines the generation process by skipping the encoding step, which can be unnecessary for tasks like text generation. This leads to faster inference times and makes models like GPT highly effective for real-time applications such as chatbot dialogue, code generation, and content creation.

Beyond NLP: Code Generation, Reinforcement Learning, and Image Processing

Beyond natural language processing, decoder-only transformers have found growing applications in domains such as code generation, reinforcement learning, and even structured generation tasks like protein folding. Models such as GPT and Codex have pushed the envelope on how transformer-based decoders can be adapted to tasks that demand fast, scalable output generation.

Implementing Decoder-Only Transformers

Notable implementations of decoder-only transformers include OpenAI’s GPT models, particularly GPT-3, which revolutionized text generation. Other models like Codex have emerged as fine-tuned versions specialized in tasks like code completion and debugging.

How to Get Started with Decoder-Only Transformers:

Explore Decoder-Only Architecture in Popular Models

Comparison Between GPT (Decoder-Only), BERT (Encoder-Only), and Encoder-Decoder (T5, Models

When discussing transformer architectures, itโ€™s essential to understand how different models are tailored for specific tasks based on their architecture. Hereโ€™s a comparison of three major transformer types: GPT (decoder-only), BERT (encoder-only), and the encoder-decoder transformer models:


GPT (Decoder-Only Transformer)

  • Architecture: GPT models, such as GPT-3, use a decoder-only architecture. In these models, input tokens are processed one at a time, with each token self-attending to the previously processed tokens. The absence of an encoder allows the model to predict and generate text in an autoregressive fashionโ€”one word at a time.
  • Strengths: GPT models excel at tasks like text generation, dialogue systems, and code completion. The autoregressive approach is particularly efficient for generating continuous text based on a given prompt.
  • Limitations: Since GPT is unidirectional, it cannot access future context. This makes it suboptimal for tasks requiring an understanding of the entire input sequence at once, such as text classification or span-based question answering.
  • Use Cases: Text completion, chatbot systems, code generation, summarization.

BERT (Encoder-Only Transformer)

  • Architecture: BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) is built using an encoder-only architecture. The key feature is that it processes input bidirectionally, meaning it takes both the left and right context of a token into account.
  • Strengths: BERT is particularly good at understanding sentence meaning, making it ideal for tasks like text classification, named entity recognition, and question answering. The bidirectional attention helps it gain a complete understanding of the sentence.
  • Limitations: BERT is not autoregressive, meaning it is not designed for tasks requiring generation. It cannot generate text word by word like GPT can.
  • Use Cases: Sentiment analysis, question answering, classification tasks.

Encoder-Decoder Models

  • Architecture: Encoder-decoder models, such as the original transformer and models like T5 and BART, involve a two-stage process. The encoder first reads and processes the entire input sequence and creates a representation of it. The decoder then takes this representation to generate the output, often attending to both the input and previous outputs.
  • Strengths: This architecture excels in tasks that require the transformation of one sequence to another (e.g., translation or summarization) because the encoder can fully understand the input before generation starts.
  • Limitations: This two-step approach can be slower for tasks where bidirectional context isnโ€™t necessary, and it may be overkill for simpler generation tasks that can be handled by decoder-only models.
  • Use Cases: Machine translation, complex summarization, question generation.

Summary of Differences

  • GPT (Decoder-Only): Best for generating text from left to right in tasks that donโ€™t require understanding both directions.
  • BERT (Encoder-Only): Great for understanding and analyzing text, especially when the task requires attention to the entire sentence context.
  • Encoder-Decoder: Suitable for complex tasks that involve transforming an input sequence into another form, such as translation and summarization.

Each architecture offers unique advantages depending on the task at hand, and understanding these differences helps engineers and researchers choose the right model architecture for their specific application.

Performance and Limitations

While decoder-only transformers excel at tasks requiring unidirectional flow (text generation or summarization), they face challenges in tasks where context from both sides (bidirectional) of a token sequence is critical. This limitation arises because, unlike encoder-decoder transformers, the decoder-only architecture processes tokens sequentially and inherently cannot see future tokens.

To overcome these limitations, researchers propose the following:

  • Feedback Transformers
  • Feedback Attention Memory

Also, there are other machine learning approaches that don’t have the same inherent limitations โ€” for instance, R

Future Directions

More on Machine Learning and AI Fundamentals at Prism14

To get occasional updates from Prism14 and info directly in your inbox ==>

==> Subscribe to Prism14โ€™s Update

Book an Appointment ==> Book Now to Learn or Integrate With Prism14

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *